Someone Remind Us Why Rihanna is Famous

Wednesday, November 24th, 2010
After a rather dull night at a club, I downloaded a leaked copy of Rihanna’s new album. I thought I had heard a snippet of Enya on one of he new tracks. “There’s no way,” I thought. “Rihanna did not sample Enya.”
rihanna
Having broken her form earlier this year with the release of “Rated R,” which displayed an “edgier” side of her music (i.e. bad language, harder beats), Rihanna had to step up her game. Well, her managers had to step up her game. So they put her in weirder outfits, toured her with Ke$ha, and played up her relationship with “bestie” Katy Perry.

Now, I like generic pop as much as the next club-bound gay guy, but there’s a point where I have to draw some sort of thick line to preserve both my dignity and my I.Q. Her new album, entitled “Loud”, (perhaps more aptly titled “Loud and Bad”) has all the promisings of a commercial success — its generic nature ensures it. It’s pop music’s job to be general, to provide some sort of all-encompassing hook to ensnare its listeners. However, if there’s a way to make pop even more generic, Rihanna’s done it.

A practice which originated in the hip hop community in the 1970s, sampling, a term created to describe musicians using other musicians work within their own song, is a tricky craft to master. Often producers will use sampling to create a catchy, recognizable beat or chorus for the listener — a chorus that will make up for the lack of bridge and contemplative verses. And Rihanna abuses it. Unlike Kanye West, who, arguably, is the proclaimed king of sampling, Rihanna fails to be original in any possible way. Original without help from her producers, that is. West often creates his own videos, writes his own verses, and shamelessly promotes his image — an image he created, no matter how much of a douchebag savant he actually is. Nevertheless, his sampling is careful and creative.

Two songs on Rihanna’s new album, “Cheers” and “Fading,” use sampling to create a familiarizing hook for the hopefully brainless listener. Taking arguably the most catchy piece of Avril Lavigne’s “I’m With You” (the annoying shrill “Yeah, yeah, yeahs” that accompany each chorus), Rihanna has created a track that fits together about as well as wet puzzle pieces. Why anyone would want to resurrect such an ear-splitting, teenage angst anthem I don’t understand, but if you’re going to sample something well-known, make sure it’s done with some tact. Lavigne’s screechy lyrics are heard at the song’s very beginning and then disappear entirely, completely incongruous to the rest of the song.

I was not mistaken. “Fading” does indeed sample Enya. I understand wanting to bridge musical styles, but Enya? I do yoga to Enya. The beat is remixed to provide a catchy backdrop for the forgettable lyrics. Forsaking art for business is not only morally reprehensible, it’s derivative, and outright boring. The purpose of sampling is to constructively borrow from another artist to cleverly insert a recognizable beat or lyric into a new song. Artists and producers like Rihanna confuse the purpose of sampling: to carefully insert a song from the past into a current song, either to bridge styles or to attract a larger audience. Rihanna’s sampling seems both reckless and out of control, revealing pop as nothing more than business, and reducing Rihanna to a product.

This has been my problem with Rihanna from the beginning. She can’t sing (but Lord does she try), she doesn’t write her own music, she doesn’t conceptualize her music videos, and she doesn’t even design her own clothing — remind me why she’s famous. Please. I welcome the challenge.

Comments

Some Marketing Machinery Made Her Famous

I found this article, because I was wondering - why are we constantly seeing and or hearing about Rihanna? The number of ads and news snippets I've seen about Rihanna do not seem to be proportionate to her looks or talent. A huge, 10K/week mega billboard on the Sunset/Vine tower in Hollywood recently displayed her in association with Coconut water. When I first saw the sign, I wondered - why her? She's fairly average looking and....aren't there more widely appealing, equally popular models/famous people who could have stood in? The amount of times I've seen and heard about her makes me think it's mostly an economic issue. In the modern global times, fewer and fewer artists get more and more of our attention. I think she's just one of the mega-media conglomerates current poster girls and she will soon pass.

I totally agree.

This article sums up my opinion on Rihanna word for word. I believe that if you actually have a good singing voice live, than you truly are a performer who should have songs written for you if you aren't the best lyricist. I don't see Rihanna as a performer. It's as if she was just handed a career, and it makes me sick. There are true artists out there who would give anything to have Rihanna's career that posses the talent for it.

sampling

Sampling was even done back in Mozart's days. Various composers based musical pieces off of the Kyrie from Mozart's Requiem mass, for example, "And With His Stripes We Are Healed" from Handel's Messiah piece. people need to get over it. all music is derivative.

hmmm

why even write about Rhianna if you don't like her at all. There are plenty of worse singers. She isn't my favorite but she isn't as bad as others.